President
Obama, Hillary Clinton, Mark Zuckerberg, Twitter, Google Science Fair, Reddit,
engineers from NASA, and the list goes on, all reached out to Ahmed asking to
meet him, talking internships, jobs, and more. Ahmed thanked everyone for all
the support, and posted a Tweet saying, “I really didn’t think people would
care about a Muslim boy.” There have been arguments made that the school followed
policy and that they had to ensure the safety of all children. People are opposing
that argument by saying that if Ahmed would have been a white boy the situation
would not have been escalated the way it did. And that the measures that
resulted in Ahmed being arrested only happened so quickly because he is a
Muslim and Muslims are associated with bombs and things of the like. Whatever
your opinion on the matter is, I thought this story would be a great opener to
discussing Muslims as presidents of the United States.
Over the
weekend, Ben Carson made a comment saying that he does not think a Muslim is
fit to be in the White House. However, he recently spoke on his comment by
saying "I don't care what a person's religion beliefs are or religious
heritage is, if they embrace our Constitution and are willing to place that
above their religious beliefs, I have no problem with that." In a Facebook
post this past Monday night Carson wrote “I could never support a candidate for
President of the United States that was Muslim and had not renounced the
central tenant of Islam: Sharia Law. Those Republicans that take issue with my
position are amazing. Under Islamic Law, homosexuals – men and women alike –
must be killed. Women must be subservient. And people following other religions
must be killed. I know that there are many peaceful Muslims who do not adhere
to these beliefs. But until these tenants are fully renounced…I cannot advocate
any Muslim candidate for President.”
Carly Fiorina
disagrees with Carson on the matter. She stated that in our constitution it
says that religion cannot be a test for office. She also stated how she believes
people of faith (any faith I am guessing since she did not specify) make better
leaders. Bernie Sanders also publicly disagreed with Caron’s opinions. He brought
up how the U.S. overcame prejudice with electing a Catholic (John F. Kennedy)
and electing an African American (Barack Obama).
There have
also been negative comments towards Obama saying that he is a Muslim. Obama has
repeatedly stated that he practices the Christian faith, and the White House
even released copies of Obama’s original birth certificate in an attempt to put
the theories to rest concerning Obama’s place of birth. Trump was questioned on the matter and did not respond, which caused some uproar by some media sites. Trump took to Twitter to say how it was a no-win situation for him.
He also commented on how it was Hillary Clinton (supposedly, I am not sure if this holds any truth or not) that first started all the rumors of Obama being a Muslim.
Some people bring
up separation of church and state, and say that as long as those who run our country have
learned the difference between the two (church and state), religion should not
be a factor in determining who can and cannot be president. What are everyone’s
opinions on this? I am not at all offering my opinion, so please do not assume
you know my opinions on this matter, this is just a really interesting subject
to me and I am interested to know everyone else’s opinions as well. I do not
want tocause any trouble on my blog, but just some food for thought… I do not see
anyone questioning Christians in positions of power. So, as long as it is the
Christian religion then it is okay, but if it is a Muslim or other religions
then it is wrong?
Thought provoking question. I'll counter with: how many readers know what yesterday and today are - religious-wise?
ReplyDeleteI love that your post points out both sides of the argument! The matter of race in today's times is very intriguing, especially in relation to the presidential campaign and all the trending topics surrounding it. I thought it was interesting how Carson explained his beliefs on why a Muslim (in looking at what their culture believes and practices) should not be President. But I also thought it was interesting how Fiorina countered by saying that religion cannot be a test for someone to be in office, but those that are religious make better leaders. Fiorina's claims were exceptionally interesting because her statements almost counter themselves. I do not see how one that could be influenced by faith could ALSO put the Constitution ABOVE those beliefs. But that's just my unpopular opinion. :)
ReplyDelete